#Casio fx 115es plus

They've added an integer portion function and a quotient/remainder division operator. In response to message #8 by Kiyoshi Akima Message #9 Posted by Kiyoshi Akima on, 4:30 p.m., It would have been even better if they'd also added mod, but at least with I/F-P we can fake it. I see they finally added integer/fractional part. Message #8 Posted by Kiyoshi Akima on, 1:33 p.m., What I like about the EL-516 (Sharp) is that you can store four formulas for future use. (I have one, too.) The battery protects memory content when the calculator is off, and kicks in when there's insufficient current from the solar panel for regular operation. ShoreĬasio does have a solar programmable: fx-3650P. Message #6 Posted by Ivan Nejgebauer on, 4:05 a.m., The Program editing mode is kind of buired in the MODE menu. I ended up using the TAS because I don't believe Casio sells it in America. In response to message #4 by Marcus von Cube, GermanyĬasio does have a solar programmable: fx-3650P. This makes a programmable much less probable. The problem with solar powered devices is that it's harder to implement constant memory. Message #4 Posted by Marcus von Cube, Germany on, 1:01 p.m., It seems like it should be possible, even if it would have to throttle its processing speed while running. One thing I'd like to see would be a solar powered programmable. If I have to go into menus, I might as well go all out and use the 50g. I think the big difference to me is that the Sharps have more commands available on the keyboard, which makes it a faster general use calculator. I think the 115ES (original) is OK, but (seemingly) unlike a lot of people here, I prefer the Sharp 516 (and even the 506).

Message #3 Posted by Crawl on, 10:54 a.m.,

#Casio fx 115es plus

I fixed this problem putting some rubber on the back.Įddie, can you confirm if both problems happen in the new plus model? So I always use it in LineIO mode.Ģ) There is no a piece of rubber on the back of the calculator to stop it from sliding all over the table.Īnd probably as consecuence of the second drawback, in my case, it does not rest on 4 points (just in 3 points) so while pushing buttons on the calculator makes the calculator go up and down making loud 'clack-clack' noises which annoy me. I cannot give it 5/5 due to the next drawbacks:ġ) In MathIO entry mode, there is no keyboard buffering, so when entering a long formula, the calculator redraws after each key press, but as the formula becomes longer and slower redraw, it can miss keystrokes. I have the old model (115 es) and I like it, it has a lot of functions for its price. Message #2 Posted by Pablo P (Spain) on, 10:41 a.m., Re: Video Review: Casio fx-115ES PLUS (OT) Still waiting for a solar RPN calculator, HP. Comparisons, product of f(x), distributions, and other new features are added. Shore on, 8:46 a.m.Ĭasio is releasing the newer versions of the fx-115ES, the fx-115ES PLUS. Video Review: Casio fx-115ES PLUS (OT) The Museum of HP Calculators